- Browse Topics
- Executive Committee
- Affiliated Faculty
- Harvard Negotiation Project
- Great Negotiator
- American Secretaries of State Project
- Opportunities for Students
- Negotiation Programs
- Mediation Programs
- One-Day Courses
- In-House Trainings and Custom Programs
- In-Person Programs
- Online Programs
- Advanced Materials Search
- Contact Information
- The Teaching Negotiation Resource Center Policies
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Negotiation Journal
- Harvard Negotiation Law Review
- Working Conference on AI, Technology, and Negotiation
- Free Reports
- Upcoming Events
- Event Series
- Event Archives
- Our Mission
- Keyword Index
PON – Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School - https://www.pon.harvard.edu
Team-Building Strategies: Building a Winning Team for Your Organization
Discover how to build a winning team and boost your business negotiation results in this free special report, Team Building Strategies for Your Organization, from Harvard Law School.
Conflict-Management Styles: Pitfalls and Best Practices
Conflict-management styles can affect how disputes play out in organizations and beyond. research on conflict-management styles offers advice on managing such difficult situations..
By Katie Shonk — on October 25th, 2021 / Conflict Resolution
People approach conflict differently, depending on their innate tendencies, their life experiences, and the demands of the moment. Negotiation and conflict-management research reveals how our differing conflict-management styles mesh with best practices in conflict resolution.
A Model of Conflict-Management Styles
In 1974, Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann introduced a questionnaire, the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument , designed to measure people’s conflict styles. Based on people’s responses to pairs of statements, the instrument categorizes respondents into five different conflict styles:
- Competing. When adopting a competing style, people view interpersonal conflict resolution as win-lose games. Rather than recognizing the value of ensuring that each party walks away satisfied, disputants focus narrowly on claiming as much as they can for themselves. While value claiming is an important component of negotiation, a single-minded competitive orientation sacrifices value in the long run and perpetuates conflict.
- Avoiding. Because dealing with conflict directly can be highly uncomfortable, many of us prefer to avoid it. An avoidant conflict style might at first appear to be the opposite of a competitive style, but in fact, it can be similarly obstructive. When we avoid conflict, we often allow problems to grow worse.
- Accommodating. Because they defer so often to others, negotiators who adopt an accommodating style can seem agreeable and easygoing. But when people consistently put others’ needs first, they are liable to experience resentment that builds up over time. Accommodating negotiators typically will benefit from learning to express their needs and concerns.
- Compromising. Sometimes we try to resolve conflict by proposing seemingly equal compromises, such as meeting in the middle between two extreme positions, or by making a significant compromise just to move forward. Although a compromising conflict style can move a conversation forward, the solution is often unsatisfying and temporary because it doesn’t address the root issues at stake.
- Collaborating. Those who adopt a collaborative conflict-resolution style work to understand the deeper needs behind other parties’ demands and to express their own needs. They see value in working through strong emotions that come up, and they propose tradeoffs across issues that will give each side more of what they want.
Claim your FREE copy: The New Conflict Management
In our FREE special report from the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School - The New Conflict Management: Effective Conflict Resolution Strategies to Avoid Litigation – renowned negotiation experts uncover unconventional approaches to conflict management that can turn adversaries into partners.
A collaborative negotiation style is usually the most effective style for managing conflict and fostering productive long-term relationships; however, different conflict-management styles can be effectively applied to different phases and types of conflict in management. Moreover, though we may have a predisposition toward a particular conflict style, we adopt different styles depending on the situation.
Competing is often useful when you’ve jointly created value through collaboration and now need to divide up resources. Accommodating may be the best immediate choice when your boss is unhappy about a project that went awry. Avoiding can be wise when someone seems volatile or when we don’t expect to deal with them again. And compromising can be a fine way of resolving a minor issue quickly.
Conflict-Management Styles : Lessons from Marriage Research
Can people with different conflict-management styles get along? In his book Why Marriages Succeed or Fail . . . and How You Can Make Yours Last (Simon & Schuster, 1995), psychologist John Gottman writes that healthy marriages tend to settle into three different styles of problem solving: validating (compromising often and working out problems to mutual satisfaction), conflict-avoidant (agreeing to disagree and rarely confronting differences directly), and volatile (frequently engaging in passionate disputes).
Perhaps surprisingly, Gottman’s research suggests that “all three styles are equally stable and bode equally well for the marriage’s future,” as he writes. Which style a couple leans toward isn’t important; what’s more important for lasting satisfaction is that both spouses adopt the same style.
Though Gottman’s research was conducted on married couples, the results suggest that disputants in the business world who have similar conflict-management styles may find they feel comfortable managing (or avoiding) conflict with each other.
When Conflict-Management Styles Are Complementary
By contrast, in the realm of negotiation, the results of a 2015 study published in the journal Negotiation and Conflict Management Research by Scott Wiltermuth, Larissa Z. Tiedens, and Margaret Neale found benefits when pairs of participants used one of two different negotiating styles.
They assigned study participants to engage in a negotiation simulation using either a dominant or submissive negotiating style. Those assigned to be dominant were told to express their preferences with confidence, use expansive body postures, and otherwise try to influence their counterpart. Those assigned to the submissive style were told to be cooperative, agreeable, and conflict avoidant.
Interestingly, pairs in which one party behaved dominantly and the other submissively achieved better results in the negotiation than pairs who were in the same condition (whether dominance, submission, or a control group). It seems the pairs of dominant/submissive negotiators benefited from their complementary communication style. A pattern in which one person stated her preferences directly and the other asked questions enabled the negotiators to claim the most value. By asking questions, the submissive negotiators assessed how to meet their own goals—and helped their dominant counterparts feel respected and competent in the process.
The research we’ve covered on negotiation and conflict-management styles suggests that opportunities to work through differences abound, regardless of our natural tendencies. Rather than spending a lot of time diagnosing each other’s conflict-management styles, strive for open collaboration that confronts difficult emotions and encourages joint problem solving.
Question: What lessons about conflict-management styles have you learned in your own negotiation and conflict-resolution efforts?
- A Case Study of Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Advanced Negotiation Strategies and Concepts: Hostage Negotiation Tips for Business Negotiators
- How to Manage Conflict at Work
- Conflict Management Skills When Dealing with an Angry Public
- Away from the Podium and Off to the Balcony: William Ury Discusses the Debt Ceiling Negotiations Facing Obama and US Congressional Republicans
Click here to cancel reply.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Are your limited business negotiation skills costing you a financially rewarding career?
Claim your FREE copy of Getting the Deal Done and Negotiate Strong Relationships at Work and at Home when you subscribe to Negotiation and pay with your credit card.
Yes! I want a risk-free trial subscription to Negotiation, the monthly newsletter of the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
[get_post_by_name page_title="N&L Widget Details Spring"] -->
Negotiation and Leadership
- Learn More about Negotiation and Leadership
NEGOTIATION MASTER CLASS
- Learn More about Harvard Negotiation Master Class
Negotiation Essentials Online
- Learn More about Negotiation Essentials Online
Select Your Free Special Report
- Negotiation Essentials Online (NEO) Spring and Summer 2023 Program Guide
- Negotiation and Leadership Fall 2023 Program Guide
- Negotiation Master Class May 2023 Program Guide
- Negotiation and Leadership Spring and Summer 2023 Program Guide
- Make the Most of Online Negotiations
- Managing Multiparty Negotiations
- Getting the Deal Done
- Salary Negotiations
- Overcoming Cultural Barriers in Negotiation
- Negotiation Training: How Harvard Negotiation Exercises, Negotiation Cases and Good Negotiation Coaching Can Make You a Better Negotiator
Teaching Negotiation Resource Center
- Teaching Materials and Publications
Stay Connected to PON
Preparing for negotiation.
Understanding how to arrange the meeting space is a key aspect of preparing for negotiation. In this video, Professor Guhan Subramanian discusses a real world example of how seating arrangements can influence a negotiator’s success. This discussion was held at the 3 day executive education workshop for senior executives at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
Guhan Subramanian is the Professor of Law and Business at the Harvard Law School and Professor of Business Law at the Harvard Business School.
Articles & Insights
- Power in Negotiations: How to Maximize a Weak BATNA
- Managing Difficult Negotiators
- How Negotiators Can Stay on Target at the Bargaining Table
- 6 Bargaining Tips and BATNA Essentials
- Negotiation in Business Without a BATNA – Is It Possible?
- A Business Negotiation Case Study: Ending the NHL Lockout
- Dealing with Cultural Barriers in Business Negotiations
- Negotiation in Business: Ethics, Bias, and Bargaining in Good Faith
- How to Balance Your Own Values in Negotiation
- In Negotiation, How Much Authority Do They Have?
- Group Decision Making: Best Practices and Pitfalls
- What is Crisis Management in Negotiation?
- Famous Negotiations Cases – NBA and the Power of Deadlines at the Bargaining Table
- Power Tactics in Negotiation: How to Gain Leverage with Stronger Parties
- “No One is Really in Charge” Hostage Taking and the Risks of No-Negotiation Policies
- Examples of Difficult Situations at Work: Consensus and Negotiated Agreements
- Dealing with Difficult People and Negotiation: When Should You Give Up the Fight?
- Consensus-Building Techniques
- Negotiation Tips: Listening Skills for Dealing with Difficult People
- How to Handle Difficult Customers
- Power in Negotiation: Examples of Being Overly Committed to the Deal
- MESO Negotiation: The Benefits of Making Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers in Business Negotiations
- What Leads to Renegotiation?
- Try a Contingent Contract if You Can’t Agree on What Will Happen
- The Winner’s Curse: Avoid This Common Trap in Auctions
- Repairing Relationships Using Negotiation Skills
- Patience is a Winning Negotiation Skill for Getting What You Want at the Negotiation Table
- Choose the Right Dispute Resolution Process
- Negotiation Case Studies: Google’s Approach to Dispute Resolution
- How To Find a Mutually Satisfactory Agreement When Negotiators are Far Apart
- Diplomatic Negotiations: The Surprising Benefits of Conflict and Teamwork at the Negotiation Table
- Dispute Resolution for India and Bangladesh
- Cross Cultural Negotiations in International Business: Four Negotiation Tips for Bargaining in China
- Famous Negotiators: Tony Blair’s 10 Principles to Guide Diplomats in International Conflict Resolution
- International Negotiations and Agenda Setting: Controlling the Flow of the Negotiation Process
- Leadership Styles in Negotiation: The Case of Ebay and Paypal
- Leadership Skills in Negotiation: How to Negotiate Equity Incentives with Senior Management
- Negotiating with Your Boss: Secure Your Mandate and Authority for External Talks
- Negotiation Skills and Bargaining Techniques from Female Executives
- Feeling Pressured by a Counterpart? Try Deal Structuring with Conditions
- Arbitration vs Mediation: What’s Wrong with Traditional Arbitration?
- How Mediation Can Help Resolve Pro Sports Disputes
- Negotiation Research on Mediation Techniques: Focus on Interests
- Mediation vs Arbitration – The Alternative Dispute Resolution Process
- Interest-Based Negotiation: In Mediation, Focus on Your Goals
- Four Negotiation Examples in the Workplace That Sought Greater Equity and Diversity
- Value Claiming in Negotiation
- In Negotiation, How Much Do Personality and Other Individual Differences Matter?
- To Achieve a Win Win Situation, First Negotiate with Yourself
- In Negotiation, Is Benevolent Deception Acceptable?
- Cole Cannon Esq. Shares His Negotiation and Leadership Experience
- Negotiation Training: What’s Special About Technology Negotiations?
- 3-D Negotiation Strategy
- Best Negotiation Books: A Negotiation Reading List
- Use a Negotiation Preparation Worksheet for Continuous Improvement
- Are Salary Negotiation Skills Different for Men and Women?
- How to Negotiate a Higher Salary
- Why Great Negotiators Earn More Money
- Make the Most of Your Salary Negotiations
- Renegotiate Salary to Your Advantage
- Negotiation Research: To Curb Deceptive Tactics in Negotiation, Confront “Paranoid Pessimism”
- The Negotiation Journal Wants to Hear From You!
- Teach Your Students to Negotiate the Technology Industry
- Planning for Cyber Defense of Critical Urban Infrastructure
- Teaching Mediation: Exercises to Help Students Acquire Mediation Skills
- Win Win Negotiation: Managing Your Counterpart’s Satisfaction
- Win-Win Negotiation Strategies for Rebuilding a Relationship
- How to Create Win-Win Situations
- How to Use Tradeoffs to Create Value in Your Negotiations
- Win Win Negotiations: Can’t Beat Them? Join a Coalition.
- Negotiation Data Repository (NDR)
- Decision Leadership: Empowering Others to Make Better Choices
- 2022 PON Great Negotiator Award Honoring Christiana Figueres
- Getting to Yes in Challenging Times
- Managing the Negotiation Within: The Internal Family Systems Model
- Mediation: Negotiation by Other Moves with Alain Lempereur
Remember Me This setting should only be used on your home or work computer.
Lost your password? Create a new password of your choice.
Copyright © 2023 Negotiation Daily. All rights reserved.
In particular, three types of conflict are common in organizations: task conflict, relationship conflict, and value conflict. Although open communication, collaboration, and respect will go a long way toward conflict management, the three types of conflict can also benefit from targeted conflict-resolution tactics.
This research result showed that, in the ParaNorman movie, four conflict types existed such as 1) character-vs-self, 2) character-vs-character, 3) character-vs-supernatural, 4) character-vs-society.
The conflict thesis is a historiographical approach in the history of science that originated in the 19th century with John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White. It maintains that there is an intrinsic intellectual conflict between religion and science, and that it inevitably leads to hostility.
types of conflict and different sources of conflict will lead to different types of conflict. ... general thesis. C: yes but isn´t that what they do maintaining claim about the role of imitation ...