phd comics grant cycle

• Skip to main content
• assistive.skiplink.to.breadcrumbs
• assistive.skiplink.to.header.menu
• assistive.skiplink.to.action.menu
• assistive.skiplink.to.quick.search

  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services | National Institutes of Health

• Created by Jonas, Nichole (NIH/NICHD) [F] , last modified on May 15, 2023

View a 508-compliant PDF of this issue here:  NICHD_Connection_2011_08.pdf

"Piled Higher and Deeper" by Jorge Cham www.phdcomics.com

PHD Comics Transcript

Title: “The Grant Cycle”

How it's supposed to work: Write grant → Get $ → Do research → Publish results → Repeat

How it really works: Do research → Get results but don't publish them yet. Call them “preliminary results” → Write grant to do what you already did → Get $ → OK, now you can publish results  OR → Use $ to pay for an unrelated new project

August 2011

Download a PDF of this edition here:

• Letter from the Editor: August 2011
• Former Fellow Follow-up with Melissa Cunningham
• Scientists Teaching Science 9-Week Course Review
• Committee Corner Column: July Committee Meeting Minutes
• New Assistant Clinical Investigators
• Building a Bridge using the Assistant Clinical Investigator Program
• Networking Demystified
• "Writing Your Grant Application" Workshop Recap
• August Announcements
• August Events

‪the grant cycle | PHD Comics | http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1431‬

@ academicssay / academicssay.tumblr.com

Understanding and solving intractable resource governance problems.

• In the Press
• Conferences and Talks
• Exploring models of electronic wastes governance in the United States and Mexico: Recycling, risk and environmental justice
• The Collaborative Resource Governance Lab (CoReGovLab)
• Water Conflicts in Mexico: A Multi-Method Approach
• Past projects
• Publications and scholarly output
• Research Interests
• Higher education and academia
• Public administration, public policy and public management research
• Research-oriented blog posts
• Stuff about research methods
• Research trajectory
• Publications
• Developing a Writing Practice
• Outlining Papers
• Publishing strategies
• Writing a book manuscript
• Writing a research paper, book chapter or dissertation/thesis chapter
• Everything Notebook
• Literature Reviews
• Note-Taking Techniques
• Organization and Time Management
• Planning Methods and Approaches
• Qualitative Methods, Qualitative Research, Qualitative Analysis
• Reading Notes of Books
• Reading Strategies
• Teaching Public Policy, Public Administration and Public Management
• My Reading Notes of Books on How to Write a Doctoral Dissertation/How to Conduct PhD Research
• Writing a Thesis (Undergraduate or Masters) or a Dissertation (PhD)
• Reading strategies for undergraduates
• Social Media in Academia
• Resources for Job Seekers in the Academic Market
• Writing Groups and Retreats
• Regional Development (Fall 2015)
• State and Local Government (Fall 2015)
• Public Policy Analysis (Fall 2016)
• Regional Development (Fall 2016)
• Public Policy Analysis (Fall 2018)
• Public Policy Analysis (Fall 2019)
• Public Policy Analysis (Spring 2016)
• POLI 351 Environmental Policy and Politics (Summer Session 2011)
• POLI 352 Comparative Politics of Public Policy (Term 2)
• POLI 375A Global Environmental Politics (Term 2)
• POLI 350A Public Policy (Term 2)
• POLI 351 Environmental Policy and Politics (Term 1)
• POLI 332 Latin American Environmental Politics (Term 2, Spring 2012)
• POLI 350A Public Policy (Term 1, Sep-Dec 2011)
• POLI 375A Global Environmental Politics (Term 1, Sep-Dec 2011)

Breaking the vicious cycle of grant writing and research funding

As I have mentioned before, I’m very lucky in that my institution is extremely supportive of my (and my colleagues’) research endeavours. There are a number of (internal) sources of funding to support scholarly research, from support via start-up funds, to individual research accounts, to competing for internal research grants, to funding conference travel. Because I have international collaborators and I’ve worked a lot within the Canadian and Mexican research funding systems, I’m very familiar with the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada , and with CONACyT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, National Council for Science and Technology) in Mexico. I’m a little less familiar with the National Science Foundation (NSF) of the United States of America, but I still know their processes a bit. I’m also a bit familiar with European (mostly French and British) granting bodies.

What seems to be the commonality in all of these is the presence of a vicious cycle of grant funding and grant writing. In order to advance your research, you need to do experiments, undertake fieldwork, participate in academic conferences and workshops. All of these activities, of course, require funding. Which, quite obviously, you don’t have as you start your academic career. More annoying is the fact that most granting agencies will demand from you previous experience managing funded projects and success winning grants. Which you can’t do, of course, because you don’t have the funding yet to execute the research activities required to gain new insights, create new knowledge, and of course, gain confidence in writing new grants so that you can get funding to do more research.

How do we break vicious cycle of grant-writing and funding? You need funding to execute projects. You need to do projects to move forward. — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 7, 2014

My first year back from Canada and arriving to Mexico, I became increasingly frustrated with the vicious cycle of grant funding and grant writing. I kept writing grant proposals, many of which were unsuccessful. I can tell you the proposed projects were fantastic, and I even received some nice commentaries “awesome proposed research, but we don’t have the money to fund you, so, SORRY”.

Last year and this year, however, I have got quite a bit of a break. I’ve successfully submitted a few grant proposals that have been externally funded and now enable me to mobilize resources in a way I couldn’t do before. And of course, with each successful proposal, I gain a lot more confidence in my abilities to secure extramural funding. So, I feel as though this is a virtuous cycle now: the more successful my grant proposals are, the more I seem to be able to write better requests for funding. But I’m also aware of how capricious these funding cycles can be. For all we know, I may have secured a lot of funding for this year, but I may hit a dry spell in the next two years too.

So here we are in a vicious cycle of grant-writing. Where you need money to demonstrate that you can in fact, win money to fund projects. — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 7, 2014

The funniest and most ironic part of this vicious cycle is that having to manage extramural funding, I’ve learned A LOT of stuff (tricks, techniques, reporting processes, even how much do things cost) that I wouldn’t have been able to learn had I not actually gotten projects funded. Getting my projects funded and executing them has actually enabled me to write better grant proposals, propose better and more robust research designs, and learn the ropes of externally-funded project management (which include budgeting, financial reporting, writing technical reports, etc). Again, as I mention, my institution is extremely generous with internal grants, but not all institutions are, and this frustrates me to no end. I thing we ought to break the vicious cycle of grant funding and grant writing.

You can't get funding unless you demonstrate that you are capable of winning grants. But to do that, you need funding. Which you don't have. — Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega (@raulpacheco) March 7, 2014

I just don’t really know how.

You can share this blog post on the following social networks by clicking on their icon.

Posted in academia .

Tagged with academia , funding , grant agencies , research .

By Raul Pacheco-Vega – March 7, 2014

One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post .

Do you know by any chance some literature about writing succesful research proposals?

Leave a Reply Cancel Some HTML is OK

Name (required)

Email (required, but never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback .

About Raul Pacheco-Vega, PhD

Find me online.

My Research Output

• Google Scholar Profile
• Academia.Edu
• ResearchGate

My Social Networks

• Polycentricity Network

Recent Posts

• Using the Pacheco-Vega workflows and frameworks to write and/or revise a scholarly book
• On framing, the value of narrative and storytelling in scholarly research, and the importance of asking the “what is this a story of” question
• The Abstract Decomposition Matrix Technique to find a gap in the literature
• 16 tips on the process of academic writing and publishing from the #ISA2023 Environmental Studies Section Speed Mentoring Session
• Producing journal article manuscripts from a doctoral dissertation

Recent Comments

• Aishah on The missing link in the literature review process: 4 elements to look for when reviewing the literature
• Xiting on The Abstract Decomposition Matrix Technique to find a gap in the literature
• Maruf Reza Byron on Writing theoretical frameworks, analytical frameworks and conceptual frameworks
• Janette Hurst on Writing theoretical frameworks, analytical frameworks and conceptual frameworks
• Esmeralda on On framing, the value of narrative and storytelling in scholarly research, and the importance of asking the “what is this a story of” question

Follow me on Twitter:

Proudly powered by WordPress and Carrington .

Carrington Theme by Crowd Favorite